> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Rosin [mailto:peda@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:13 PM > To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx; > Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [patch v5] i2c: mux: mellanox: add driver > > [resend to all, got the wrong button, sorry] > > On 2016-11-10 11:42, Peter Rosin wrote: > > On 2016-11-03 06:20, Vadim Pasternak wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I see that this patch has not been picked-up yet for i2c-next. > >> Is it possible it was missed from some reason? > > > > Yes, apparently, really sorry about that! > > > > I'll put it in a branch and make a pull request for Wolfram (but that > > is a bit new for me, we'll see how it goes). > > But now that I looked again, I noticed that the source is dual licensed and yet > your MODULE_LICENSE tag says only "GPL v2". I.e. the same issue your i2c > master driver had that Vladimir Zapolskiy noticed. > > Please fix this, and it might be a good idea to take a look in your other drivers as > well in case you have further problems in this department... Hi Peter, Thank you for reply. I'll re-submit it from the current i2c next branch. Since I'll fix the license, I guess I should issue it as "patch v6". Right? Cheers, Vadim. > > Also, while at it, the patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore, please rebase to > something more current. > > Cheers, > Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
