On 2016-08-25 21:03, kbuild test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/for-next > head: 431f07e8b0097ded2ffb773d4ea6a797b2bc8bfe > commit: 24882319480379588d0cced458ed7dd670e93fc7 [5/14] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct > config: i386-randconfig-s0-201634 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 > reproduce: > git checkout 24882319480379588d0cced458ed7dd670e93fc7 > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=i386 > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c: In function 'drm_dp_aux_init': >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:810:10: error: 'struct i2c_adapter' has no member named 'lock_bus'; did you mean 'lock_ops'? > aux->ddc.lock_bus = lock_bus; > ^ >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:811:10: error: 'struct i2c_adapter' has no member named 'trylock_bus'; did you mean 'lock_ops'? > aux->ddc.trylock_bus = trylock_bus; > ^ >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:812:10: error: 'struct i2c_adapter' has no member named 'unlock_bus'; did you mean 'lock_ops'? > aux->ddc.unlock_bus = unlock_bus; > ^ > > vim +810 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c > > 4f71d0cb Dave Airlie 2014-06-04 804 mutex_init(&aux->hw_mutex); > 4f71d0cb Dave Airlie 2014-06-04 805 > 88759686 Thierry Reding 2013-12-12 806 aux->ddc.algo = &drm_dp_i2c_algo; > 88759686 Thierry Reding 2013-12-12 807 aux->ddc.algo_data = aux; > 88759686 Thierry Reding 2013-12-12 808 aux->ddc.retries = 3; > 88759686 Thierry Reding 2013-12-12 809 > 0c2f6f1a Chris Wilson 2016-06-17 @810 aux->ddc.lock_bus = lock_bus; > 0c2f6f1a Chris Wilson 2016-06-17 @811 aux->ddc.trylock_bus = trylock_bus; > 0c2f6f1a Chris Wilson 2016-06-17 @812 aux->ddc.unlock_bus = unlock_bus; > acd8f414 Chris Wilson 2016-06-17 813 } > acd8f414 Chris Wilson 2016-06-17 814 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_init); > acd8f414 Chris Wilson 2016-06-17 815 > > :::::: The code at line 810 was first introduced by commit > :::::: 0c2f6f1a561136a09c5de91889d0aa35e13f73d4 drm: Pass the drm_dp_aux->hw_mutex to i2c for its locking > > :::::: TO: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > :::::: CC: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation Sorry about this, I obviously didn't know about that new user. Should have looked closer... Wolfram, should I send an amended patch so that you can replace this offender and keep things bisect-able, or do you want just a delta? Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
