On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:36:29PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > i2c-octeon-objs := i2c-cavium.o i2c-octeon-core.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OCTEON) += i2c-octeon.o > > +i2c-thunderx-objs := i2c-cavium.o i2c-thunderx-core.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_THUNDERX) += i2c-thunderx.o > > Shouldn't that rather be "i2c-cavium-core.o", Thinking of it again, it should probably even be "i2c-octeon-core.o" to avoid confusion because all the functions start with octeon_* > "i2c-octeon-platdrv.o", and "i2c-thunderx-pcidrv.o" for the -objs? Those names still make sense :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
