> For > example some Tegra devices have an I2C interface which may share its > pins with other devices and to share these pins subnodes for > representing these pins so they have be shared via the pinctrl framework > are needed. I think the above sentence is hard to grasp. Can you split it into more sentences perhaps? > +- i2c-bus > + For I2C adapters that have child nodes that are a mixture of both I2C > + devices and non-I2C devices (such as a pin controller), the 'i2c-bus' I suggest to drop the phrase in the paranthesis. It is true for your case, but I don't think it's generic. So, it is not an obvious example like "Yes, sure, I see that a pin controller has I2C nodes and non-I2C nodes". At least for me, it was more like "It has what?"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
