On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:19:32AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jun 23 2016 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 04:53:50PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > > +
> > > +static struct i2c_driver rmi_smb_driver = {
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > + .name = "rmi4_smbus",
> > > + .pm = &rmi_smb_pm,
> > > + .resume = rmi_smb_resume,
> >
> > Why rmi_smb_resume is not part of rmi_smb_pm?
> >
>
> This is because rmi_smbus device both have a PS/2 interface and a SMBus
> one. I'll have to check again now that I have a slightly different way
> of binding smbus devices in my tree, but the issue was:
> - having resume part of pm means it will get caught by PM directly
> - the PS/2 node gets also resumed by PM
> - calling PS/2 commands during resume switches the devices back into
> PS/2 and stops the SMBus communication.
>
> So it's easier to wait only for the PS/2 PM resume call which will call
> the SMBus resume function when the device is in a proper state.
>
> I'll send out the updated patch with your comments next week hopefully.
Hmm, I think you will have to walk me through resume process. How do we
tie in PS/2 and I2C on these devices abd have PS/2 code call into this
driver?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
