On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:46:55PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:55:52PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:09:42AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > - removed the .resume hook as upstream changed suspend/resume hooks and there > > > > > is no need in the end to re-enable host notify on resume (tested on Lenovo > > > > > t440 and t450). > > > > > > > > Actually, this hook seemed to be required on the Lenovo T440 (Haswell) > > > > but not on the T450 (Broadwell) laptop I have now here. > > > > > > > > Wolfram, I can resend the whole series or a follow-up patch to re-enable > > > > after resume Host Notify. How do you prefer I deal with that? > > > > > > That depends a little how we want to handle patch 4. I am going to apply > > > patches 1+2 today to my tree. Then you can just resend patch 3 which I > > > hope will get some review soon, but I will pick it up for 4.8 later > > > nonetheless. If it is not causing too much dependency hassle, I'd prefer > > > that patch 4 goes via Dmitry's input tree. > > > > Any chance I could get a stable branch with these 2 patches based on 4.6 > > so that I can pull it and merge the #4? This way we do not need to wait > > for 2 releases to merge everything... > > Sure. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/host-notify Thanks! -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
