On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:56:11PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:03:34PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > The Display Port Auxiliary (DPAUX) channel pads can be shared with an > > internal I2C controller. Add pinctrl support for these pads so that the > > I2C controller can request and use these pads. > > > > Jon Hunter (13): > > drm/tegra: Clean-up if probing DPAUX fails > > drm/tegra: Add helper functions for setting up DPAUX pads > > dt-bindings: drm/tegra: Update DPAUX documentation > > drm/tegra: Add sor-safe clock for DPAUX on Tegra210 > > drm/tegra: Prepare DPAUX for supporting generic PM domains > > pinctrl: pinconf: Add generic helper function for freeing mappings > > dt-bindings: i2c: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode > > i2c: core: Add support for 'i2c-bus' subnode > > dt-bindings: drm/tegra: Add DPAUX pinctrl documentation > > drm/tegra: Add pinctrl support for DPAUX > > arm64: tegra: Add SOR power-domain node > > arm64: tegra: Add sor-safe clock to DPAUX binding > > arm64: tegra: Add DPAUX pinctrl bindings > > There aren't really any hard dependencies between all these patches, > right? I think the worst case would be if the arm64 DTS changes get > merged before the I2C core changes (i2c-bus node support), then the > I2C core will complain about the pinmux nodes, but that wouldn't be > fatal, or have any bad side-effects, right? Oh wait... there's the pinctrl helper function that is a build- dependency. Linus, would you be okay if I took that through the drm-tegra tree along with the DPAUX driver change, and provide a stable branch for you to resolve conflicts against if needed? Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
