On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Octavian, >> >> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 06:43:21 AM kbuild test robot wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> [auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next] >>> [also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc3] >>> [cannot apply to next-20160614] >>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] >>> >>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Octavian-Purdila/ACPI-overlays/20160614-202312 >>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next >>> config: x86_64-allyesconfig (attached as .config) >>> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-1) 6.1.1 20160430 >>> reproduce: >>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >>> make ARCH=x86_64 >>> >>> Note: the linux-review/Octavian-Purdila/ACPI-overlays/20160614-202312 HEAD 042f716a165ffa274684c787377acddfc1f34e3f builds fine. >>> It only hurts bisectibility. >>> >>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >>> >>> drivers/acpi/configfs.c: In function 'acpi_configfs_init': >>> >> drivers/acpi/configfs.c:19:31: error: 'acpi_configfs' undeclared (first use in this function) >>> struct config_group *root = &acpi_configfs.su_group; >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> drivers/acpi/configfs.c:19:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in >>> drivers/acpi/configfs.c: In function 'acpi_configfs_exit': >>> drivers/acpi/configfs.c:33:33: error: 'acpi_configfs' undeclared (first use in this function) >>> configfs_unregister_subsystem(&acpi_configfs); >>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> vim +/acpi_configfs +19 drivers/acpi/configfs.c >>> >>> 13 #include <linux/configfs.h> >>> 14 #include <linux/acpi.h> >>> 15 >>> 16 static int __init acpi_configfs_init(void) >>> 17 { >>> 18 int ret; >>> > 19 struct config_group *root = &acpi_configfs.su_group; >>> 20 >>> 21 config_group_init(root); >>> 22 >>> >>> --- >> >> Any chance to send an updated patch with this fixed? >> >> No need to resend the whole series, just this single patch, please. >> > > Oops, sorry about that. I will have to resend at least the last two > patches to fix this issue, but since I have missed to add the > Reviewed-by from Mika for another two patches, its probably best to > resend the whole series? Yes, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
