On 14 June 2016 at 17:35, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:07 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> The current code that deploys the system PM support relies on the
>> "direct_complete" feature supported by the PM core. The goal is to
>> avoid
>> performing unnecessary operations during the system PM sequence.
>>
>
>>
>> static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
>> - .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare,
>> - .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete,
>> - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend,
>> dw_i2c_plat_resume)
>> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume,
>> NULL)
>> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
>> + pm_runtime_force_resume)
>> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend,
>> + dw_i2c_plat_runtime_resume,
>> + NULL)
>> };
>
> UNIVERSAL_PM_OPS ?
The UNIVERSAL_DEV_PM_OPS assigns the same callbacks for system PM as
runtime PM, that doesn't work here.
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
