New drivers should not use dma_request_slave_channel_reason() but
dma_request_chan(). The former is a macro to the later so this change do
not effect the driver in any way.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
index c42d52a..cf82438 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static struct dma_chan *rcar_i2c_request_dma_chan(struct device *dev,
char *chan_name = dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV ? "tx" : "rx";
int ret;
- chan = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, chan_name);
+ chan = dma_request_chan(dev, chan_name);
if (IS_ERR(chan)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(chan);
dev_dbg(dev, "request_channel failed for %s (%d)\n",
--
2.8.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
