Re: [PATCH] i2c: Raise SDA for each received bit, if necessary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Am 13.05.2016 um 12:33 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> 
>> I was playing with the DRM framework and an old SiS graphics card. I
>> discovered this issue while trying to read the EDID from the monitor.
> 
> So, there is no upstream user yet?

No.

>> I have a few other SiS cards/models here and they all expose this
>> behavior. So I guess it's intentional(==cheaper?), although the HW docs
>> don't seem mention it explicitly.
> 
> OK. Well. As this flag is potentially dangerous, I would prefer to not
> apply the patch unless there is an upstream user of this. If there is
> one, I'd be okay with applying it with the flag renamed to something
> like "dangerous_push_pull_bus" or similar with additional comments
> saying there is some (broken) HW which needs it but nobody should get
> the idea to design a bus like this.
> 
> Makes sense?

Sure, thanks!

Best regards
Thomas

> Regards,
> 
>    Wolfram
> 


-- 
GnuPG:          http://tdz.users.sourceforge.net/tdz.asc
Fingerprint:    16FF F599 82F8 E5AA 18C6 5220 D9DA D7D4 4EF1 DF08
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux