On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:35:39AM +0800, Liguo Zhang wrote: > Send the next transfer in the i2c irq handler, and only signal > complete() when the entire transaction has been completed. This describes what you do. But not why. Is this an improvment of throughput? Is there a downside of interrupt latency? Thanks. > > Signed-off-by: Liguo Zhang <liguo.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > change in v2: > Remove the unused variable left_num in mtk_i2c_transfer().
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
