On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:17:49 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:40:33PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The I2C bus names are supposed to be stable as they can be used by > > userspace to uniquely identify a specific I2C bus. So restore the > > original names for all legacy (pre-SB800) devices. > > > > For SB800 devices and later, improve the names. "SDA" refers to the > > serial data pin of each SMBus port, it's an implementation detail the > > user doesn't need to know. Use "port" instead, which is easier to > > understand. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Christian Fetzer <fetzer.ch@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Changed the subject to "don't regress on bus names" and applied to > for-current, thanks! Thanks. > Jean, could you use the "i2c: <driver>: <subject>" (check git log for > examples) pattern for your future patches? Thanks! OK, I will do that. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
