Hi Wolfram, On 2016-01-05 19:48, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Peter, > >> PS. needs a bunch of testing, I do not have access to all the involved hw > > First of all, thanks for diving into this topic and the huge effort you > apparently have put into it. Yeah, I started with dipping just the toes, but now it rather feels like I'm fully submerged at the deep end... > It is obviously a quite intrusive series, so it needs careful review. > TBH, I can't really tell when I have the bandwidth to do that, so I hope > other people will step up. And yes, it needs serious testing. > > To all: Although I appreciate any review support, I'd think the first > thing to be done should be a very high level review - is this series > worth the huge update? Is the path chosen proper? Stuff like this. I'd > appreciate Acks or Revs for that. Stuff like fixing checkpatch warnings > and other minor stuff should come later. Right, I'll hold back on sending updates for trivial stuff until the big picture stuff has been cleared. Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
