Hi Mika,
On 12/15/15 15:55, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
Add device HID AMDI0510 to match the I2C controlers on AMD Seattle platform
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
index 57f623b..a027154 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
{ "80860F41", 0 },
{ "808622C1", 0 },
{ "AMD0010", 0 },
+ { "AMDI0510", 0 },
{ }
Since this driver seems to be used by several SOCs, and we have been
adding the HID from various SOC vendors. Do you think it would be better
to assign a CID so that each SOC vendor can specify in their ACPI DSDT
and we can match them here?
Then, we can also associate the FMCN and SSCN along with the CID, and
guarantee compatibility.
Thanks,
Suravee
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dw_i2c_acpi_match);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
