Hi Wolfram, 2015-06-17 12:29 GMT+02:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Now if anyone has a more educated view on this than I do, please speak >> up. Android is really not my thing (as a developer, I mean.) > > While working again on adding i2ctransfer to i2c-tools, it became clear > that this android makefile would need an update for it, too. And since > nobody of us is using i2c-tools on android, nobody can provide a tested > update. Nobody but me! Actually I'm using it and I had the need for it. Probably there are other people reinventing the wheel outside this mailinglist. Try to google for it. > So, it would indeed be easier if the android universe would > figure a way in their sphere. So, I agree with Jean. I think it's more a matter of a makefile approach. They use a non recursive one (recommended by several papers[1]) and it's up to external projects if embrace it or no. Honestly I think that a minuscule file with really low maintenance should be added. I'm glad to prepare a new patch if maintainership is interested! Sincerely, Angelo [1] http://aegis.sourceforge.net/auug97.pdf -- Profile: http://it.linkedin.com/in/compagnucciangelo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
