Re: [PATCH 01/14] parport: return value of attach and parport_register_driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



1) We can't apply this patch on its own so this way of breaking up the
patches doesn't work.

2) I was thinking that all the ->attach() calls would have to succeed or
we would bail.  Having some of them succeed and some fail doesn't seem
like it will simplify the driver code very much.  But I can also see
your point.  Hm...

Minor comment:  No need to preserve the error code if there are lots
which we miss.  We may as well hard code an error code.  But that's a
minor thing.  Does this actually simplify the driver code?  That's the
more important thing.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux