Hi Wolfram, On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 01:24 +-0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Presented like this I wonder if this merits being a dev+AF8-err at all. +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- Wouldn't dev+AF8-dbg be more adequate? This might remove the need for the +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- condition and also avoid bothering everyone if something in the platform +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- device structures or device tree is not right. +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- return irq+ADs- /+ACo- -ENXIO +ACo-/ +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AH0- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- We've just had similar discussion related to DW APB UART with Andy here +AD4- +AD4- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/412 +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- +AD4- So yes probably we may safely remove error message from here completely. +AD4- +AD4- So, do you want to send a V2? Sorry for this delay - I was away for last few days. I'm about to send v2 with removal of error message completely. -Alexey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
