On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 20:11 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Yes, I was thinking even about some wrapper on top of platform_get_irq() > > since it seems there are no messaging done inside platform.c, though > > devm_* functions usually have it. > > When I had a look a few months ago, the situation with devm_* was messy. > Some rightfully printed errors, some rightfully didn't, some vice versa, > some the other way around, and some did something else... > > For driver authors, it is hard to see/remember which devm function does > it and which doesn't. IMO a good cleanup will get rid of this mess. I > started sketching something but especially clks and irqs are basically > everywhere and so it easily grew out of the fun-time project scale, > sadly. Yeah, same for me. I've checked the situation with platform_get_irq() and estimate the amount of drivers about 300. That's why I discourage to create another one that needs to be fixed in the future. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
