Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] DT: i2c: Deprecate adi,adxl34x compatible string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(CC'ing Dmitry)

On Monday 02 March 2015 07:40:49 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:27:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 26 January 2015 13:09:47 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>>>> If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it
> >>>>> encounters it in a .dts.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it
> >>>> is not different from 345 (which is fine by me).
> >>>
> >>> To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be
> >>> omitted from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching.
> >> 
> >> Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like
> >> i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live
> >> with it :)
> > 
> > What happened to this patch ?
> 
> My idea was that Dmitry takes them both because they are related:
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/21763

I'm fine with that. Dmitry ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux