On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:27:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Monday 26 January 2015 13:09:47 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it > > > >> encounters > > > >> it in a .dts. > > > > > > > > Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it is > > > > not different from 345 (which is fine by me). > > > > > > To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be omitted > > > from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching. > > > > Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like > > i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live > > with it :) > > What happened to this patch ? My idea was that Dmitry takes them both because they are related: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/21763
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
