Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] DT: i2c: Deprecate adi,adxl34x compatible string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:27:49PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On Monday 26 January 2015 13:09:47 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > >> If you drop adi,adxl346, checkpatch will start complaining if it
> > > >> encounters
> > > >> it in a .dts.
> > > > 
> > > > Boah, this is annoying. That means we need an 346 entry even if it is
> > > > not different from 345 (which is fine by me).
> > > 
> > > To be clear: you need the entry in the documentation. It can be omitted
> > > from the driver if it's not (yet) used for matching.
> > 
> > Well, I don't really like that behaviour, but I don't like
> > i2c/trivial-devices.txt as well, so I'll just apply the patch and live
> > with it :)
> 
> What happened to this patch ?

My idea was that Dmitry takes them both because they are related:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/21763

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux