On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 19:42 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Shouldn't the latter be a dev_dbg? > > > > Wolfram, do we agree on this as states in the patch? Maybe you have more > > comments, questions? > > Yes, it is fine this way. > > > Otherwise, should I rebase this on top of 4.0-rc1 or you will be okay > > with current version? > > Well, if it needs rebasing, please do. If not, please say so, too :) It applies clearly on top of current linux-next without any changes from my side. So, no rebase is needed. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
