Re: [PATCH] i2c: sh_mobile: I2C_SH_MOBILE should depend on HAS_DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If ARM and SUPERH imply HAS_DMA, that formula is almost identical to
> the one I proposed in my patch?

Ehrm, true :)

>        depends on HAS_DMA
>        depends on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE || COMPILE_TEST
> 
> I just prefer to split dependencies in two lines where it makes sense ("hard"
> dependencies vs. "soft" (user platform configuration) dependencies).

I prefer my version slightly. But not worth the hazzle, I'll pick yours.

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux