> If you don't read all the below, my belief is that we should simply > rename the strings in Addy's patch. We should change "rise-ns" to > "i2c-scl-rising-time" and "fall-ns" to "i2c-scl-falling-time". > Wolfram: can you confirm this is OK? I'm voting to leave the "-ns" > off the end of both to avoid asymmetry. New binding should have the "-ns" suffix, right? So, I'd vote to add the suffix to the new bindings and deprecate the ones used in the designware driver: "i2c-scl-rising-time-ns" and "i2c-scl-falling-time-ns" It might be a little more work now, but it will help us in the future, because it is the correct way to do it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
