Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: omap: fix "Too much work in one IRQ" irq handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, 

18 нояб. 2014 г., в 19:12, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> написал(а):

> I got confused with all the patches sent out for his issues. Can you ack
> them once you are fine and mention if you consider them important for
> this or the next release? That would be really helpful!

Duplicate/Obsolete (v1):
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411059/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411060/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411081/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411084/

v2 (in review by Aaro)
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411714/

comment to v2:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/411740/

latest, v3 (same as v2, fixed subject line):
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/412095/

So, for now only one (v2 or v3) patch should be accepted or declined.
All others should be dropped and forgotten.

Sorry, for making so much noise.

Alexander.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux