Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: omap: fix "Too much work in one IRQ" irq handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > right, Linux doesn't support being the slave. That's also a missing
> > > feature, not a bug.
> > 
> > This is going to change. I sent out RFC patches for slave support [1]
> > and will send V1 this week. This won't affect your driver, though,
> > unless you implement the backend into it.
> > 
> > Just to keep your heads up.
> > 
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1783295
> 
> sweet :-)

V1 was sent out a few seconds ago :)

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/18/678

> Still, as of now we can't consider what Alexander mentions a bug. Good
> to get it sorted out, but not -rc material.

I got confused with all the patches sent out for his issues. Can you ack
them once you are fine and mention if you consider them important for
this or the next release? That would be really helpful!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux