Re: [PATCH v2] i2c:at91: add bound checking on SMBus block length bytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

Could you take this patch into your tree?

Thanks

Regards

Ludovic

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 09:39:41PM -0400, Marek Roszko wrote:
> The driver was not bound checking the received length byte to ensure it was within the
> the buffer size that is allocated for SMBus blocks. This resulted in buffer overflows
> whenever an invalid length byte was received.
> It also failed to ensure the length byte was not zero. If it received zero, it would end up
> in an infinite loop as the at91_twi_read_next_byte function returned immediately without
> allowing RHR to be read to clear the RXRDY interrupt.
> 
> Tested agaisnt a SMBus compliant battery.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Roszko <mark.roszko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Change from v1:
> fixed typo in commit message
> reworded message slightly to be specifically say length byte
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> index e95f9ba..ec4ff33 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct at91_twi_dev {
>  	unsigned twi_cwgr_reg;
>  	struct at91_twi_pdata *pdata;
>  	bool use_dma;
> +	bool recv_len_abort;
>  	struct at91_twi_dma dma;
>  };
>  
> @@ -267,12 +268,24 @@ static void at91_twi_read_next_byte(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
>  	*dev->buf = at91_twi_read(dev, AT91_TWI_RHR) & 0xff;
>  	--dev->buf_len;
>  
> +	/* return if aborting, we only needed to read RHR to clear RXRDY*/
> +	if (dev->recv_len_abort)
> +		return;
> +
>  	/* handle I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA */
>  	if (unlikely(dev->msg->flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN)) {
> -		dev->msg->flags &= ~I2C_M_RECV_LEN;
> -		dev->buf_len += *dev->buf;
> -		dev->msg->len = dev->buf_len + 1;
> -		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "received block length %d\n", dev->buf_len);
> +		/* ensure length byte is a valid value */
> +		if (*dev->buf <= I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX && *dev->buf > 0) {
> +			dev->msg->flags &= ~I2C_M_RECV_LEN;
> +			dev->buf_len += *dev->buf;
> +			dev->msg->len = dev->buf_len + 1;
> +			dev_dbg(dev->dev, "received block length %d\n",
> +					 dev->buf_len);
> +		} else {
> +			/* abort and send the stop by reading one more byte */
> +			dev->recv_len_abort = true;
> +			dev->buf_len = 1;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* send stop if second but last byte has been read */
> @@ -444,6 +457,12 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
>  		ret = -EIO;
>  		goto error;
>  	}
> +	if (dev->recv_len_abort) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "invalid smbus block length recvd\n");
> +		ret = -EPROTO;
> +		goto error;
> +	}
> +
>  	dev_dbg(dev->dev, "transfer complete\n");
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -500,6 +519,7 @@ static int at91_twi_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msg, int num)
>  	dev->buf_len = m_start->len;
>  	dev->buf = m_start->buf;
>  	dev->msg = m_start;
> +	dev->recv_len_abort = false;
>  
>  	ret = at91_do_twi_transfer(dev);
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux