Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:39:35PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > @@ -193,6 +216,7 @@ static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx1_i2c_hwdata  = {
> >  	.ndivs			= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_i2c_clk_div),
> >  	.i2sr_clr_opcode	= I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W0C,
> >  	.i2cr_ien_opcode	= I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_1,
> > +	.has_dma_support	= false,
> > 
> >  };
> > 
> > @@ -203,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct imx_i2c_hwdata imx21_i2c_hwdata  =
> > { .ndivs			= ARRAY_SIZE(imx_i2c_clk_div),
> >  	.i2sr_clr_opcode	= I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W0C,
> >  	.i2cr_ien_opcode	= I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_1,
> > +	.has_dma_support	= false,
> > 
> >  };
> > 
> > @@ -213,6 +238,7 @@ static struct imx_i2c_hwdata vf610_i2c_hwdata = {
> >  	.ndivs			= ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_i2c_clk_div),
> >  	.i2sr_clr_opcode	= I2SR_CLR_OPCODE_W1C,
> >  	.i2cr_ien_opcode	= I2CR_IEN_OPCODE_0,
> > +	.has_dma_support	= true,
> 
> So why exactly don't we have a DT prop for determining whether the controller 
> has DMA support ?

Using DMA or PIO is a decision that should be made by driver on its own,
not device tree.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux