On 18 February 2014 21:50, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18 February 2014 19:43, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I added the IS_ERR, check as you suggested. That caused a rebase of >>> the other patches as well. >>> >>> Sorry if it was unclear. >> >> No problem. I am about to apply all patches except 17 as you suggested. >> It fails here, however, although I applied Linus' patch first. What >> exactly is your base? Any chance to publish your branch? >> > > I have several branches. :-) > > My patches applies on top 3.14-rc1 + Linus' patch. > > It also applies on > "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-nomadik.git" > on the i2c-nomadik, which already holds Linus's patch. This is what I > thought was important due what's stated in the MAINATAINERS file. > > Now, I guess I should use your tree instead, > "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git". Any > particular branch I should use? Maybe it's also better if I just > resend the patches in a new patchset, once I rebased them towards your > tree? Sorry, I have taken Linus v1 patch as base, it should have been v2 of course. Sorry for wasting your time. I will rebase and send v4 patches asap. Kind regards Uffe > > Kind regards > Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
