On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > On 13/02/2014 21:36, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer, > > having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just > > have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where > > some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes > > the code much easier to follow. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > With this one the bug we observed was fixed. I squashed patches 1+2 (easier handling for stable) and applied to for-current, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
