On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:49:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on > > PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this. > Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP without using > PM_RUNTIME? No, not at all. Android does make aggressive use of sleep but it's also highly desirable to use runtime PM - for example you don't want to have to power up the entire SoC simply because the system is getting a new e-mail pushed to it or location updates, most of the hardware is doing nothing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
