> > ... then you'll still need this. > > Yes, I was far too vague..I'm going to stop explicitly populating the > data field. > > static const struct of_device_id bcm59056_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "brcm,bcm59056"}, > { } > }; +1 > > And I don't think you can drop this, as the I2C subsystem still > > insists on it. > > Agreed. I'm just dropping explicit population of the driver_data field > here. > > static const struct i2c_device_id bcm59056_i2c_id[] = { > { "bcm59056" }, > { } > }; +1 > > I think you need to keep this to supply the silly I2C ID table. > > > > I would just omit the '.data = (void *) VERSION' from the > > of_match_table until you require it. > > Well, it's not even necessary for I2C ID table. the I2C subsystem is > happy with just a matching entry on the i2c_device_id name field and > NULL driver_data. palmas is implemented in this manner. Guess what? +1 :) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html