> Note: The class cannot be called 'eeprom' as that is the name of the > I/O file created by the driver. The class name appears as a > sub-directory within the main device directory. Hence the class name > 'eeprom_dev'. I am not sure I follow the reasoning here, but it is possibly because I lack some knowledge. Could you please describe bad thing would happen if "/sys/class/eeprom/eeprom0/label" would be used as opposed to "/sys/class/eeprom_dev/eeprom0/label"? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
