On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:20:23PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Tested with RIIC2 on a genmai board. Others untested but hopefully
> >> trivial enough to be added.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> V2: adapt to established sorting
> >
> > Thanks. This seems safe enough and I will queue it up.
>
> Note that after dropping these lines:
>
> CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee000.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP97]),
> CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee400.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP96]),
> CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee800.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP95]),
> CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfeec00.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP94]),
>
> i2c stopped working.
??? Why do you want to drop these lines?
If the i2c clocks are not registered, you won't get i2c support? Am I
missing something?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
