On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:59:28AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/08/2013 02:49 AM, Florian Meier wrote: > > In order to find I2C devices in the device tree, the platform nodes > > have to be known by the I2C core. Analogous to the i2c-omap driver > > this requires setting the dev.of_node parameter of the adapter. > > (CCing the I2C maintainers...) > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c > > > @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static int bcm2835_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > strlcpy(adap->name, "bcm2835 I2C adapter", sizeof(adap->name)); > > adap->algo = &bcm2835_i2c_algo; > > adap->dev.parent = &pdev->dev; > > + adap->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; > > Ah, that makes sense. Thinking about it now, I'd only ever used i2cget > etc. to access I2C devices, rather than instantiating drivers from DT. > > That all said, I wonder if the I2C core shouldn't do something like the > following inside i2c_add_adapter(): > > if (!adap->dev.of_node && adap->dev.parent) > adap->dev.of_node = adap->dev.parent->of_node; Should this not also have an of_node_get to increment the ref count on the node? Thanks, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html