On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 09:58:51AM +0100, Andreas Werner wrote:
> Revision 2:
> - delete the pch_err completly instead of changing to pch_dbg
> because there is already a pch_dbg at the function who calls
> pch_i2c_getack.
> - Fixed message line issue
I prefer this below "---" after Signed-off.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c
> index 0f37529..5c39f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-eg20t.c
> @@ -321,10 +321,8 @@ static s32 pch_i2c_getack(struct i2c_algo_pch_data *adap)
> void __iomem *p = adap->pch_base_address;
> reg_val = ioread32(p + PCH_I2CSR) & PCH_GETACK;
>
> - if (reg_val != 0) {
> - pch_err(adap, "return%d\n", -EPROTO);
> + if (reg_val != 0)
> return -EPROTO;
That could be fixed to -ENXIO according to
Documentation/i2c/fault-codes.
> @@ -367,8 +365,7 @@ static int pch_i2c_wait_for_check_xfer(struct i2c_algo_pch_data *adap)
> adap->pch_event_flag = 0;
>
> if (pch_i2c_getack(adap)) {
> - pch_dbg(adap, "Receive NACK for slave address"
> - "setting\n");
> + pch_dbg(adap, "Receive NACK for slave address setting\n");
> return -EIO;
What about returning the value we got from pch_i2c_getack?
Regards,
Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
