On Friday, October 25, 2013 01:59:09 PM Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:19:00PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > Current spi bus_num.chip_select "spix.y" based device naming scheme may not > > be stable enough to be used in name based matching, for instance within > > ALSA SoC subsystem. > > I'm happy with this from the SPI side modulo Raphael's comments - are > folks happy from the ACPI side? I think yes in general, but I'd like to understand why the ACPI_HANDLE() thing doesn't work as expected. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
