On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:05:37PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > So in the mean time are you happy with this "dummy" approach? > > > > No. "dummy" is reserved for a dummy device in case an i2c slave needs > > > more than one address. The proper solution would be if > > > i2c_sysfs_new_device() could recognize the of_device_ids. > > > Okay, thanks for clarifying. > > Or for now to use something like stw481x (even if it's never expected to > actually make a difference). If Linus wants to resubmit, I'm happy with that. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
