> > So in the mean time are you happy with this "dummy" approach? > > No. "dummy" is reserved for a dummy device in case an i2c slave needs > more than one address. The proper solution would be if > i2c_sysfs_new_device() could recognize the of_device_ids. Okay, thanks for clarifying. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
