On 08/19/2013 03:11 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi,
Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
of the loop, I mean.
Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
Felipe to -next. Thanks!
Thanks.
It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap,
and will need the same change.
Somebody up for this?
Regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
