Hi, > > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I > > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out > > of the loop, I mean. Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and Felipe to -next. Thanks! > It looks like TI's i2c-davinci will have the same problem as i2c-omap, > and will need the same change. Somebody up for this?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
