On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:59:19 +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > On 10/10/2012 10:54, Bo Shen wrote: > > On 9/19/2012 23:54, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:28:04 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>> The problematic code appears to be: > >>> > >>> snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-gpio%d", pdev->id); > >>> > >>> Instead, I think that should be something more like: > >>> > >>> adap->name = dev_name(&pdev->dev); > >> > >> strlcpy(adap->name, dev_name(&pdev->dev), sizeof(adap->name)) > >> if anything, as adap->name is a buffer, not a pointer. > > > > I am sorry for late. I have tested with DT, it works. > > > > Please send this patch to fix the issue. > > Thanks. > > Ping? > > Will you send this patch? Which patch, please? On September 18th, you sent a first version. Stephen Warren asked you for a change, but you never sent version two of the patch including the requested change. So don't be surprised if your patch never got applied. > Or, I send this patch and add your S.O.B, which do you prefer? I prefer that you send patch v2 and let the interested parties review and apply it. Do not add S-o-B for anyone else, ever. Note that i2c-gpio is normally handled by Wolfram Sang, not me. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
