On Friday 12 October 2012 08:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > When using runtime PM with auto-suspend timeouts, why would you disable > the IRQ before the runtime suspend handlers have run? > > If you really want to do this, you probably should have these in the > runtime PM callbacks. But I'll wait until you add a more descriptive > changelog before I can really tell why this is being done. Based on the > discussion in the patch from Kalle, I'm assuming this is to prevent > interrups when I2C is being used by co-processors. If so, plese > describe in the changelog. > > That being said, doesn't the runtime suspend callback already disable > IRQs at the device level instead of the INTC level? I thought of not relying on the intc as the registers may be reconfigured. > Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
