On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/03/2012 05:58 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> No, this is wrong. Platform data should not override DT. >>> >>> If DT is enabled and passed, it should have highest priority. > > No, that's wrong. If platform data is specified, it overrides DT, so > that if the DT needs any fixup, it can be provided using platform data. Thanks Stephen, now there are two of us saying this, Lee please follow this design pattern. (Unless Rob/Grant start shouting counter-orders...) Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
