On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, this is wrong. Platform data should not override DT. > > If DT is enabled and passed, it should have highest priority. Oh is that so. Rob: do we have a clear consensus on this? Then we should document it in Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt. (That document isn't part of the binding I believe, so we could define Linux-specific behaviours in it.) I always thought it was the other way around, that pdata took priority. Usecase: hardcoded bootloader passer erroneous DT to a platform. No way out. What to do? Override with pdata. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
