On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:13:58PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:24:38PM +0200, Stephen Warren wrote: > > IIRC, I proposed it before solely to solve some suspend/resume ordering > > issues, and Colin Cross NAKd it. These days, deferred probe should make > > this change unnecessary. > How does deferred probe solve this? Iirc the problem is that i2c is needed to > talk to the PMIC, so we need to make sure i2c is shutdown last because drivers > might want to do regulator control in the suspend function. With probe deferral the drivers will be after the regulator driver in the DPM list and so be suspended first. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
