Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] i2c: omap: Add support for I2C_M_STOP message flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jean,

On Tuesday 17 July 2012 17:29:35 Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:17:09 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Generate a stop condition after each message marked with I2C_M_STOP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |    2 ++
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> > index 801df60..cf1bda0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> > @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ static int omap_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > 
> >  	if (dev->speed > 400)
> >  	
> >  		w |= OMAP_I2C_CON_OPMODE_HS;
> > 
> > +	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_STOP)
> > +		stop = 1;
> > 
> >  	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
> >  	
> >  		w |= OMAP_I2C_CON_XA;
> >  	
> >  	if (!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD))
> 
> Looks OK to me, but I can't test it, and I also don't know a thing
> about OMAP.

I've tested it and it works :-)

> Maybe it would be a good idea to let omap_i2c_func() return
> I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING now?

Good point. It should already have been returned, as the driver already 
supports I2C_M_IGNORE_ACK.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux