> > > > > No, it doesn't. See above about small transfers. Consider the easy > > > > > situation where you have sensor on one bus (so you do PIO because you > > > > > transfer small data) and you have EEPROM on other bus, where you use > > > > > DMA because you transfer large data. And the mixed mode isn't there > > > > > yet. > > > > > > > > I fully understand what you want to configure. I did before. Yet, > > > > devicetree bindings are not platform_data and shouldn't be used like > > > > them. > > > > > > But then, how would you configure this detail on a per-bus basis? Well > > > all > > > > This is a question for devicetree-discuss. > > Did you Cc it? Well, I guess you already checked the mail headers and found out yourself. The question behind the question probably is "Why didn't you CC it?". The answer to that is that I didn't have much success by adding it to $RANDOM_THREAD. It might be more efficient to answer starting a new thread with explicit "[RFC] $THE_ISSUE". Since a conclusion there won't make the next merge-window anyhow, I haven't done that now. That put aside, it might be more efficient if someone with a bigger urge might strive for a solution (yes, probably, but not necessarily you). For me, it currently is just one task which needs to be scheduled inbetween others. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
