On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:41:31PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote: > From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> > > The OMAP3530 is based upon the same silicon as the OMAP3430 and so the I2C > revision is the same for 3430 and 3530. However, the OMAP3630 device has the > same I2C revision as OMAP4. Correct the revision definition to reflect this. > > This patch is based on work done by Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> > Changes from his patch > - Update OMAP_I2C_REV_ON_3430 also to reflect that it is same as 3530 > > Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> Applied to next, thanks. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
