Hi Gary,
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 10:25:58 Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-06-26 10:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 June 2012 16:49:35 jean-philippe francois wrote:
> >> 2012/6/26 Laurent Pinchart<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> While trying to use an OV7725 camera sensor with an OMAP3 system I ran
> >>> into a couple of issues related to the sensor communication protocol.
> >>> Instead of using the obiquitous I2C protocol, Omnivision invited the
> >>> SCCB communication bus, very similar to I2C but different enough not to
> >>> be compatible.
> >>
> >> I have been using omnivision sensor without being aware of this issue,
> >> and without any i2c reliability issue either.
> >>
> >> Here is typical code I use :
> >>
> >> /* This function is used to read value from register for i2c client */
> >> static int ov2710_read(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned short reg,
> >> unsigned char *val)
> >> {
> >>
> >> int err = 0;
> >> unsigned char outbuf[] = {(reg>>8)&0xff, reg&0xff};
> >
> > According to the SCCB specification (or at least the version I've found)
> > register addresses are 8-bit. The OV2710 might just be I2C-compatible.
> >
> >> unsigned char inbuf[1];
> >> struct i2c_msg msg[] = {
> >>
> >> { .addr = client->addr, .flags = 0, .buf = outbuf, .len = 2 },
> >> { .addr = client->addr, .flags = I2C_M_RD, .buf = inbuf, .len =
> >> 1 },
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> err = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 2);
> >> /* error handling and pass by ref handling */
> >> ....
> >>
> >> }
> >
> > The ov772x driver uses i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() and
> > i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(). The later calls
> >
> > i2c_smbus_xfer(client->adapter, client->addr, client->flags,
> >
> > I2C_SMBUS_READ, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA,&data);
> >
> > which calls i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated() for hosts that don't support SMBus
> > transfers natively, and that's pretty much equivalent to your above code
> > (except for the 8/16 bit register address).
> >
> > It might be a good idea to implement i2c_smbus_*-like functions for 16-bit
> > register addresses in the I2C core, they could be reused across drivers.
> >
> >> Is the point of this patch to avoid writing such functions again and
> >> again in every ov driver ?
> >
> > No, but that's a good idea as well :-)
> >
> >> What is solved in practice by this patch that is not solved by a regular
> >> i2c transfer ?
> >
> > The above code will not ignore acks/nacks and will not generate a stop
> > condition between the two messages. The SCCB specification states that
> > acks/nacks must be ignored and that a stop condition must be generated.
> > The OV7725 handles acks/nacks correctly, but chokes if no stop condition
> > is generated. The point of this patch set is to fix both problems
> > (although the acks/nacks issue might be theoretical only).
>
> How does it "choke"? I've had success talking to the OV8820 using the
> normal I2C driver as well.
With the patches applied:
[ 23.277893] omap3isp omap3isp: Revision 15.0 found
[ 23.283721] omap-iommu omap-iommu.0: isp: version 1.1
[ 25.244079] ov772x 2-0021: ov7725 Product ID 77:21 Manufacturer ID 7f:a2
Without the patches applied:
[ 23.505493] omap3isp omap3isp: Revision 15.0 found
[ 23.511138] omap-iommu omap-iommu.0: isp: version 1.1
[ 25.552246] omap_i2c omap_i2c.2: Arbitration lost
[ 26.583160] omap_i2c omap_i2c.2: timeout waiting for bus ready
[ 27.598785] omap_i2c omap_i2c.2: timeout waiting for bus ready
[ 28.614196] omap_i2c omap_i2c.2: timeout waiting for bus ready
[ 28.623260] isp_register_subdev_group: Unable to register subdev ov772x
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
